Changes to the library

The reason I started this blog was to advertise the wonderful resource that is the BNS / RNS library as there are changes afoot.  I have just been advised of the (?final) details of those changes. They are:

  1. As of NOW (with no warning to the membership), we are no longer able to borrow books.
  2. The library has to close for a time whilst the Warburg is undergoing refurbishment.  On re-opening the RNS / BNS library will be housed within the Warburg collection on open access.  The books will be kept together but the journals will be dispersed around the Warburg.  Unfortunately, the Warburg’s cataloguing system is bizarre and unique so expect to spend several hours (if not days) trying to find where they are.

Although I am pleased that one of my concerns has been met (splitting the library up completely), the fact that members can no longer borrow books is a major concern and a major hindrance to research.  Inter-library loan is a red herring waved around by those who have access to other major numismatic libraries (it is slow, expensive and the books will come covered in “do not photocopy” labels).

Surely, a major change like this should be subject to a vote by the membership of both societies?  The fact that it has been pushed through with no consultation I find very disturbing.

I’d be interested in other people’s views.  If you feel strongly on this matter, please write to the Councils of your respective Society.


2 thoughts on “Changes to the library

  1. Dr Greg Stevens

    Over the last 40 years or so there has been a slow but definite movement to see London as the centre of everything. As a joint member of both the BNS and RNS who lives in the South West of England, I find it incredulous that both councils see this move as appropriate to the needs of the membership or a means to further numismatic research.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. John

    What geniuses on the RNS and BNS Councils thought that withdrawing membership benefits was a good idea? The membership benefits listed on the websites of both Societies are very ‘thin’ considering modern expectations (and being invited to purchase things is not a benefit, for goodness sake!). Doubtless these changes aim to eliminate a perceived problem – whether managerial or financial I cannot say – but they may prove to be a false economy in the long run. It would be difficult to recommend to someone that they join based on the current list of so-called ‘benefits’.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s